Found on America OnLine. Note how Clinton/Gore backed off their abortion rights position

Found on America OnLine. Note how Clinton/Gore backed off their 
abortion rights position and how a a fucking religious originization 
intimidated the entire world.
================================================================

IS THERE A VATICAN AGENDA?

Is there a Vatican Agenda, in respect to its avowed antagonism toward 
the upcoming Cairo Population Conference? If so, what is this agenda, 
and what are its consequences if carried out? What are the facts 
pertaining to the Vatican's ongoing opposition to artificial 
contraception, and abortion? These are the topics which will be 
covered in this article.

In regard to the Cairo Conference, it is already a matter of public 
record that:

1- The Vatican is totally opposed to any liberalization of family 
planning measures, which it denouces as "cultural imperialism" on the 
part of the West.

2- The Vatican  has instigated secret meetings with their 
counterparts in Muslim countries, to drum up support for an 
anti-contraceptive, anti-abortion, and overall anti-population 
control stance,

Before going on to the Vatican's specific agenda, it is worthwhile 
reviewing the basis for its current violent stance against practical 
family-planning measures. It can be said that the modern opposition 
to artificial methods of birth control began with the poorly 
conceived papal encyclical "Humanae Vitae" issued in 1968. This 
encyclical, written by Paul VI, was astounding if for no other reason 
than it contradicted the majority decision of his own appointed Papal 
Commission. This conclusion was to liberalize the Church's teaching, 
to allow the use of aritifical contraceptives.

Rather than listen to his own Commission, however, Paul VI opted to 
listen to a Vatican relic Cardinal Ottaviani.  Ottaviani warned him 
that should he change the Church's teaching stance - and follow the 
recommendation of the Papal Commission, the Church would lose its 
"authority". After all, for many years the Church had openly insisted 
that artificial contraception was grievously wrong - now, all of a 
sudden, it would reverse this for the World to see? This, Ottaviani 
insisted, would be utter folly and disaster. WIth this sense of 
insecurity now moverwhelming him, Paul VI acceded to Ottaviani and 
rejected his own Commission's finding and recommendation. The rest is 
now history.

Since that infamous date of issuing the encyclical, more than 2 
billion have been added to the world's population - mostly in the 
underdeveloped nations. These billions must compete for an ever 
shrinking share of resources, including food, fresh potable water and 
fuel. Author David Yallop, in his courageous book "In God's Name", 
notes the effects (Yallop, 1984, p. 58): On a disaster scale for the 
Roman Catholic Church,( the encyclical Humanae Vitae) measures higher 
than the treatment of Galileo in the 17th century, and the 
declaration of papal infallibility in the 19th

In his book, Yallop also lays the blame for the vast amount of  
ensuing human misery and suffering directly at the feet of "Humane 
Vitae", and insists that Cardinal Ottaviani - among others "bear an 
awesome responsibility for what was to follow.... The amount of 
death, misery and suffering that directly resulted from the papal 
decision can to a large degree be laid  directly at their feet". 
(Yallop, 1984, p. 54).  Yallop goes even further, in documenting the 
role of a clique of Vatican n'er do wells in the murder of Pope John 
Paul I, in September, 1978. It is interesting to note that Alberto 
Luciani (John Paul I) had fully expressed his intention to revise the 
Church's teaching against aritifical contraceptives (Yallop, 1984). 
This, however, was probably not the sole motive for his murder: he 
also intended to press for a full investigation of the Vatican Bank 
and its links to the Banco Ambrosiano, as well as the role of 
Archbishop Paul Marcinkus in the Bank's murky dealings.

With Luciani (John Paul I) removed from the scene, the stage was set 
for Karol Woltjyla - one of the most reactionary, anti-contraception 
bishops in Poland, to take the reigns as John Paul II. Not 
surprisingly perhaps, he proceeded to mount an ongoing, extremely 
hostile campaign against all forms of legitimate family planning 
(with the exception of the useless "rhythm method" of 
Ogino-Knaus).This entailed not only making pronouncements from the 
Vatican, but actually travelling to various underdeveloped and 
overpopulated countires - in Latin American and Africa especially - 
and exhort the masses therein not to partake of family planning 
methods. To the extent he has done this - and succeeded in dissuading 
people from rational family planning, John Paul II can be regarded as 
an eco-criminal - since this policy has direectly contributed to 
catastrophic consumption and contamination of the planet's finite 
resources.

The question now emerges: What could possibly be this Pope's - and by 
extension, the Vatican's, agenda - in relentlessly condemning family 
planning organizations worldwide, and waging all out propaganda war 
against them? If one considers the history of the Roman Catholic 
Church - and the recent developments of the past twenty-five years, 
there is only one objective: the domination of the Western World by 
sheer numbers of Catholics - thereby ushering in a new "Holy Roman 
Empire" centered on the Vatican. Indeed, the United States is by no 
means excluded from the Vatican's nefarious plans.

Certainly, in the United States, the Vatican influences population 
growth - and demographics - not only by its stance against family 
planning, but by its immigration policies. These include enunciated 
papal positions to the effect that:(see. e.g. Simcox, 1993):

1- Every human on Earth has a divine right to migrate to the United 
States and take up residence there in the pursuit of a better life,

2- The United States has no inherent right to limit immigration,

3- The Catholic Church rejects the notion of national sovereignty,

4- Immigration restrictions are immoral

5- The Catholic Church rejects the U.S. government's distinction 
between political and economic refugees.


These documented positions clearly disclose the Vatican's agenda, in 
terms of a blatant attempt to interfere in standing U.S. immigration 
policies, in an effort to tilt U.S. population demographics toward 
Catholicism - via the infusion of a plethora of Catholic immigrants. 
This is confirmed by remarks of the Rev. Richard J. Ryscavage quoted 
in "The National Catholic Register" (Nov. 8, 1992) in terms of why 
"the Church is going to be very healthy in the 21st century".

Further, if the Vatican can succeed in overturning the legal 
immigration limits in the U.S., then conceivably it can do so 
anywhere - including western Europe. In this way one immediately can 
recognize the underlying hidden agenda in its anti- contraceptive 
stance: to overload the underdeveloped nations with too many people, 
creating population pressures that will overflow into the U.S. and 
Europe - converting both de facto into appendages of the Vatican 
hierarchy. This is why the U.S. must absolutely not relent in 
maintaining controls over its borders, and not give into the Vatican.

As a final note, to attempt to increase paranoia and distrust of any 
and all family planners, the Vatican has sowed multiple rumors in 
third world countries to the effect that the U.S. and its western 
European cohorts are attempting to "control the populations of 
non-white countries."  To foment distrust in Islamic countries, the 
Vatican has merely altered its propaganda wording to read: "control 
the populations of Muslim countries". Already, the efficacy of this 
despicable and cynical strategy is apparent - what with Muslim 
fundamentalist groups threatening to kill any Population Conference 
participants in Cairo, and Saudi Arabia withdrawing entirely.

It is hoped that all atheists who read this article, will take up 
their pickets and protest strongly when the Pope comes to this 
country in October. He must not be allowed to forget what a callous, 
ecological criminal he really is - and how his intentional plan for 
overpopulation of the Earth - to further his own religion's 
ambitions, makes him no better than Hitler - since a genocide of 
famine, disease and war awaits millions of those trapped within the 
destitution he and his Church have created.

 References:

Simcox, D.:1993, "The Catholic Hierarchy and Immigration: Boundless 
Compassion-Limited Responsibility", The Soical Contract, Vol.3, pp. 
90-95

Yallop, D.: 1984, In God's Name, Corgi Books, Great Britain.