Satanic inquisitors from the town hall By Rosie Waterhouse, Independent On Sunday, 07.10.9

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Satanic inquisitors from the town hall By Rosie Waterhouse, Independent On Sunday, 07.10.90 The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire, Dan Crompton,[picture] right, wants to "kill off" the Nottingham abuse stories "once and for all", and says: "Leading questions making suggestions to the child can seriously contaminate evidence" The principle social worker in charge of the Nottingham case, Judith Dawson, defends her team's handling of the claims: "We've learnt that children are not only sexually abused in some families, but ritualistically abused" EVIDENCE of Satanic child abuse was promised last week. It would be revealed "for the first time on British television", in a Dispatches programme on Channel 4. Sensational headlines after the press preview ensured the ratings were high. The setting for the programme climax, a cemetery near Sherwood forest in Nottingham at the dead of night, was suitably spooky, worthy of a Hammer horror movie. The camera filmed underground tunnels, half-burnt candles, drawings of crosses and "something that looks like a little altar". A torchlight search of the cemetery lodge uncovered a brochure on making home movies, literature on fostering children, sex and flagellation magazines, and a foot-long dildo. The viewer was invited to see this "evidence" - combined with the earlier testimony of social workers and foster parents - as proof that at least 50 children in Nottingham had been sexually abused during Satanic rituals that included drinking blood and sacrificing sheep and babies. But the police disagreed profoundly. By the end of the week they had provided plausible explanations to counter each claim. A "tunnel" under Wollaton Hall, a natural-history museum, where sexual abuse was said to have taken place, was a disused bowling alley filled with rubble. They dismissed claims that sacrificed bodies were buried in existing graves on the simple basis that there was no evidence that graves had been disturbed. Nottingham is riddled with tunnels and caves; those under the cemetery had been searched by police and "nothing significant was found." The graveyard was in Nottingham's red-light district and was a favourite haunt of "prostitutes, glue-sniffers and winos - but not Devil-worshippers". The sex objects were "awaiting disposal, having been picked up as litter", and the documents about fostering children had been obtained by a couple, whom police had interviewed and who had a legitimate interest in fostering a child. It is conceivable that the police missed certain tunnels, and it is, sadly, quite possible that children could be taken to such places and sexually abused by perverts. But that does not prove, as proponents of Satanic abuse stories claim, that covens of witches and Satanists throughout Britain - and the world - are sacrificing and eating babies, specially bred for the purpose by young "brood mares". But after the Dispatches programme and before the police statement, proponents of such stories were able to say that they had evidence. SOcial workers in other cities where allegations of Satanic abuse have been made, but then discredited because police found no evidence, cited Nottingham as proof for their claims. As a result, in Manchester and Rochdale, solicitors and councillors representing families who are fighting to get back children taken into care after allegations of Satanic abuse were dismayed to see public opinion shift yet again from scepticism to belief. In an exclusive interview with The Independent on Sunday, Dan Crompton, the Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire, expressed his anger that a team of social workers should continue to make claims that exhaustive investigations by police and other social workers have been unable to corroborate with hard evidence; and that programme-makers should sensationalise such allegations and accuse police of failing to investigate thoroughly. Mr Crompton is deeply worried that "an orthodoxy of belief" about Satanic abuse is becoming established among some child care professionals, and is sweeping Britain, "like an epidemic if Asian flu". He revealed that he is to send a confidential internal report to the Home Secretary, David Waddington, to "Kill off once and for all" stories that children from Nottingham have been victims of Satanic abuse. Mr Crompton hopes that the lessons learnt in Nottingham can be applied elsewhere and warns there will be further panic about Satanic abuse unless the Government and the legal profession address the complex issues involved. In his report, he will call for changes in the techniques used to interview children where sexual abuse is suspected, and in the rules governing proceedings to make children wards of court. Criticising the way social workers interviewed children in Nottingham, he said: "Disclosure work needs to be tightly controlled. Leading questions, prompting, making suggestions to, the child can seriously contaminate evidence." Mr Crompton also believes the interests of parents and other adults accused of child abuse are not adequately represented in wardship proceedings, where the uncorroborated disclosures of children, perhaps wrongly interpreted by social workers, are enough to satisfy a judge that he should make a care order. "In a criminal case, the police need to prove what occurred "beyond a reasonable doubt". In a civil case the standard of proof is "on the balance of probabilities". The standard required in child-care proceedings is even less - and here lies the danger. Surely standards of evidence-gathering, investigation and presentation have to be maintained if we are not to revert to the "ducking-stool" form of justice. "If action is taken in the absence of sound corroborative evidence, the removal of children from the parental home could, in some cases, be a monumental injustice and the trauma, anxiety and family conflict that this provokes will be as devastating as child abuse itself." Mr Crompton also fears that "in our thirst for disclosures" the continual questioning and medical examination of children, sometimes lasting fro years, constitutes another form of abuse, which again traumatises the child and prevents recovery. And he is frustrated that unsubstantiated stories and professional hysteria about so-called Satanic or ritualistic abuse is diverting attention and scarce resources from investigating real cases of child abuse. There is no question that some children suffer appalling sexual abuse, as 23 children did in the Nottingham case undoubtedly did - eight members of their family and an adult friend were jailed in January 1989 for vile offenses in circumstances that the judge described as a "vortex of evil." Months after the children were taken into care they began to talk of witchcraft and Satanic ceremonies. But police found no evidence of Satanism. And as The Independent on Sunday has revealed, the stories of witches and monsters, babies and blood, started only after play techniques were introduced into the questioning of the children by social workers from the NSPCC. The stories took on a new meaning when foster parents and social workers were given a list of "Satanic indicators", signs and symptoms of Satanic abuse which originated in the United States. The list was supplied by an American social worker, Pamela Klein, She specialises in Satanic abuse and "diagnosed" on of the first cases in Britain, in KEnt, at around the same time as the stories surfaced in Nottingham. The list included such symptoms as nightmares, bed-wetting, fear of monsters and ghosts, and "preoccupation with faeces, urine and passing gas". Using the indicators as a checklist, the social workers concluded that the Nottingham children were victims of a new phenomenon, which, they were told, was sweeping across America and had just reached Britain. Nobody would doubt the sincerity of the foster parents or social workers interviewed on Dispatches, who believed that these children and at least 27 others were also victims of Satanic abuse. But the programme did not mention another social worker on the team who was victimised because she did doubted the Satanic claims. Nor did it mention a foster parent who criticised the questioning techniques suggested by social workers and refused their instruction to take the children to a cemetery. The programme featured, in silhouette, two women involved in the Nottingham case who corroborated stories of Satanism and sacrifice. In a confidential report after an inquiry by police and social workers into the allegations of Satanic abuse, these witnesses were "found to be lying in every respect that could actually be checked". The programme did not include a third adult who told similar stories but later informed police and the inquiry team they were untrue. Nor did it question the fact that most of the disclosures of witch parties, the killings of babies and the slaughtering of sheep were supposed to have taken place in the living room or garden of a semi-detached house on a council estate, without neighbours noticing. There is no doubt that the social workers and foster parents interviewed on the Dispatches programme genuinely believe that have encountered Satanic abuse of the children in their care. In an article in New Statesman and Society [See File SS051090.ASC] on Friday, Judith Dawson, the principle professional officer in charge of the Nottingham case, defended the social workers' handling of the further allegations of Satanic abuse and explained her belief that "ritualised" abuse exists. And although she wrote with obvious distress about being betrayed and not believed, she was still unable to provide hard evidence of Satanism. She dismissed suggestions that Satanic abuse is a myth inspired by evangelical fundamentalists. She said she now had to preface the many talks she gives on the subject by saying that "we are a secular team and the team does not believe in the Devil nor in God ... or the power of witchcraft. We all, however believe that some adults will use any means to terrify children into silence". Ms Dawson does not refer to her own beliefs, if any, but she has appeared on a video-tape produced by the Evangelical Alliance, a fundamentalist Christian organisation with one million members in Britain. Published in july and called Doorways to Danger, the video warns adults and children of the dangers of dabbling in the occult, from Ouija boards and tarot cards to witchcraft and black magic. On film Ms Dawson says: "What we've learnt is that children are not only sexually abused in some families, but that they're also ritualistically abused. that means that we have learnt that some families, some adults, get involved with Satanic groups whose main aim is to destroy everything that is good about human life. There's a particular target in that, which is that they should hurt and defile children. As you are probably aware, Christ said: "Touch not one hair of this child's head." Satanists believe that they should do the opposite of that." In the face of emotive arguments that children cannot invent bizarre stories about sacrifices and blood, and the media are wrong to be sceptical about the existence of Satanic abuse, it is worth re-calling how the scare began. As The Independent on Sunday disclosed in August, the stories started in the United States after the publication in 1980 of a book which was said to be the true account of an adult survivor of Satanic abuse. No such stories preceded it, but many followed, in books, in testimonies to church congregations, and in psychiatric cases. Accusations that whole towns were abusing children in Satanic covens led to numerous police investigations, but no corroborative evidence. The panic spread to Britain early in 1988 through several channels, including the evangelical Christian movement, in books and testimonies of survivors and "Deliverance" ministers, and through "experts" from the US who spread the message here, in newspapers and on conference circuits. Once here, the stories have been spread by Christian organisations such as the Association of Christian Psychiatrists and the Social Workers Christian Fellowship, by churches, anti-occult campaigners and by born-again "survivors" of Satanic abuse. As previously reported, the NSPCC has also played a crucial part in spreading in scare nationwide, and a particularly pivotal role in Nottingham. A key seminar took place in reading in September 1989, when Judith Dawson and Christine Johnston, the two main social workers involved in the Nottingham case, first went public with stories of Satanism. At the seminar, a police officer [Jerry Simandl] told of a baby cooked in a microwave oven during a Satanic ceremony. A week later a child in Nottingham was believed when he "disclosed" he had seen a baby - and also an adult - cooked in a microwave oven. After the Reading seminar, at least seven new cases were reported to the police from Liverpool to Strathclyde. They have found no evidence of Satanic rites. The most enlightening insight into what happened in Nottingham, and possibly elsewhere, is contained in the 650-page report complied by in inquiry team of police and social workers set up by the Chief Constable and Director of Social Services. It is a damning indictment of the interviewing techniques and leading questions used by social workers. Professors John and Elizabeth Newson, psychologists who were asked by assess the techniques used, concluded that one 17-year-old girl "was led to confabulate" a story that she had taken part in Satanic sacrifices. The girl later said the story totally untrue and that "the only knowledge that she had, had come from social workers, that she had been pressurised, that the social workers would not take no for an answer". The report concluded: "The social workers who already believed in Satanic abuse could by this method convince a child that she was a murderer and that she was guilty of cannibalism and Devil Worship...It is a sobering thought that in the 17th century [she] could have been burnt as a witch with inquisitors using identical methods."


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank