Brent Steven Lemons – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Brent Steven Lemons.
The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient… Warren Buffet
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Brent Steven Lemons. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About Brent Lemons
Brent Steven Lemons is an Investment Adviser. Brent Steven Lemons’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 1050255 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/1050255.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Brent Steven Lemons.
Brent Steven Lemons has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of Brent Steven Lemons’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 6/10/2009
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA:
- Initiated By: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Allegations: SEC ADMIN RELEASE 34-60092, JUNE 10, 2009: THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (COMMISSION) DEEMS IT APPROPRIATE AND IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BE, AND HEREBY ARE, INSTITUTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (EXCHANGE ACT) AGAINST BRENT LEMONS ( ESPONDENT). ON MAY 27, 2009, AN INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED BY CONSENT AGAINST LEMONS, PERMANENTLY ENJOINING HIM FROM FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 10(B) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND RULE 10B-5 THEREUNDER, IN THE CIVIL ACTION ENTITLED SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. BRENT LEMONS, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 6:08-CV-00308, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, TYLER DIVISION.
- Resolution: Order
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent)
- Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: ANY CAPACITY
- Duration: Indefinite
- Start Date: 6/10/2009
DISCLOSURE 2 –
- Event Date: 11/12/2008
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: 07-01866
- DocketNumberAAO: 07-01866
- Initiated By: FINRA
- Allegations: LEMONS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH AN ARBITRATION AWARD OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR TO SATISFACTORILY RESPOND TO FINRA REQUEST TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
- Resolution: Other
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Suspension
- Sanction Details: PURSUANT TO ARTICLE VI, SECTION 3 OF FINRA BY-LAWS AND NASD RULE 9554, RESPONDENT’S REGISTRATION WITH FINRA IS SUSPENDED ON NOVEMBER 12, 2008, FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH AN ARBITRATION AWARD OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ARBITRATION CASE #07-01866 OR TO SATISFACTORILY RESPOND TO FINRA REQUEST TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
DISCLOSURE 3 –
- Event Date: 8/7/2008
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: ARBITRATION NO. 07-01596
- DocketNumberAAO: 07-01596
- Initiated By: FINRA
- Allegations: LEMONS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH AN ARBITRATION AWARD OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR TO SATISFACTORILY RESPOND TO FINRA REQUEST TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
- Resolution: Other
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Suspension
- Sanction Details: PURSUANT TO ARTICLE VI, SECTION 3 OF FINRA BY-LAWS AND NASD RULE 9554, LEMONS’ REGISTRATION WITH FINRA IS SUSPENDED ON AUGUST 7, 2008 FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH AN ARBITRATION AWARD OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ARBITRATION CASE #07-01596 OR TO SATISFACTORILY RESPOND TO FINRA REQUEST TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
DISCLOSURE 4 –
- Event Date: 8/1/2008
- Disclosure Type: Civil
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: Initiated By: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Allegations: SEC LITIGATION RELEASE 20669, AUGUST 1, 2008: THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (COMMISSION) FILED A CIVIL ACTION AGAINST BRENT S. LEMONS. THE COMMISSION’S COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT FROM ABOUT SEPTEMBER 2004 THROUGH APRIL 2007 LEMONS MISAPPROPRIATED OVER $1.3 MILLION IN FUNDS FROM AT LEAST THREE OF HIS CUSTOMERS. IN ITS COMPLAINT, THE COMMISSION ALLEGES THAT LEMONS VIOLATED SECTION 10(B) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 AND RULE 10B-5 THERE UNDER. ACCORDING TO THE COMMISSION’S COMPLAINT, LEMONS MANAGED THE FINANCIAL AFFAIRS FOR SOME OF HIS CUSTOMERS AND MISUSED THEIR TRUST TO PERPETRATE HIS FRAUDULENT SCHEME. THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT LEMONS HAD HIS CUSTOMERS SIGN BANK AND BROKERAGE DOCUMENTS IN BLANK, UNDER THE FALSE PRETENSE THAT HE WOULD USE THE DOCUMENTS TO LIQUIDATE SECURITIES IN THEIR ACCOUNTS AND REINVEST THE PROCEEDS IN HIGHER YIELDING SECURITIES. LEMONS INSTEAD USED THE DOCUMENTS SIGNED IN BLANK TO EXTRACT FUNDS FOR HIS PERSONAL USE FROM THE ACCOUNTS OF HIS CUSTOMERS WITHOUT THEIR AUTHORIZATION. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINT, THE MAJORITY OF THE MISAPPROPRIATED FUNDS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN USED TO COVER LEMONS’ GAMBLING LOSSES OF APPROXIMATELY $1.4 MILLION.
- Resolution: Judgment Rendered
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Injunction
DISCLOSURE 5 –
- Event Date: 6/27/2008
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: 07-00471
- DocketNumberAAO: 07-00471
- Initiated By: FINRA
- Allegations: LEMONS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH AN ARBITRATION AWARD OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR TO SATISFACTORILY RESPOND TO A FINRA REQUEST TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
- Resolution: Other
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Suspension
- Sanction Details: PURSUANT TO ARTICLE VI, SECTION 3 OF FINRA BY-LAWS, AND NASD RULE 9554, LEMONS’ FINRA REGISTRATION IS SUSPENDED JUNE 27, 2008 FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ARBITRATION AWARD OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR TO SATISFACTORILY RESPOND TO FINRA REQUESTS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
DISCLOSURE 6 –
- Event Date: 6/21/2007
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Award / Judgment
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW FRAUD; NEGLIGENCE AND GROSS NEGLIGENCE; BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY; MISREPRESENTATIONS AND OMISSIONS; CHURNING; UNAUTHORIZED TRADING; SUITABILITY RULES; SELLING AWAY; EXCESSIVE TRADING; EXCESSIVE COMMISSIONS; BREACH OF DUITIES OWED TO RETAIL CUSTOMER; MISAPPROPRIATION AND CONVERSION OF FUNDS; VIOLATION OF DUTY AND FAIR DEALING AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE; USE OF MANIPULATIVE, DECEPTIVE OR FRAUDULENT DEVICES OR CONTRIVANCES.
- Damage Amount Requested: $902,080.22
- Arbitration Claim File Detail: 07-01866
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 7 –
- Event Date: 2/13/2007
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Award / Judgment
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW FRAUD, NEGLIGENCE AND GROSS NEGLIGENCE BREACH OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, MISREPRESENTATIONS AND OMISSIONS, CHURNING, UNAUTHORIZED TRADING, UNSUITABILITY, EXCESSIVE TRADING, MISAPPROPRIATION AND CONVERSION OF CUSTOMER FUNDS.
- Arbitration Claim File Detail: 07-00471
- Arbitration Docket Number:
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Previous Associations
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- BANC OF AMERICA INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. (CRD#: 16361) :: 9/24/2004 – 5/22/2007 :: TYLER, TX
- A. G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC. (CRD#: 4) :: 6/28/1982 – 10/28/2004 :: ST. LOUIS, MO
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Brent Steven Lemons, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Sometimes investment losses occur because advisors, stockbrokers, and even brokerage firms, commit fraud. Massimo Vignelli
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report Brent Lemons
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
Brent Steven Lemons – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (1050255) for the broker – Brent Steven Lemons
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘The Skeptic Files,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.
To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/brent-steven-lemons/.
