David James Mura – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with David James Mura.
The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient… Warren Buffet
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to David James Mura. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About David Mura
David James Mura is an Investment Adviser. David James Mura’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 2238675 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/2238675.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for David James Mura.
David James Mura has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of David James Mura’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 8/15/2014
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLAIMANTS ALLEGE UNSUITABILITY, NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AND BREACH OF CONTRACT.
- Damage Amount Requested: $268,000.00
- Settlement Amount: $55,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 2 –
- Event Date: 8/5/2013
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: UNSUITABILITY, PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AND BREACH OF CONTRACT.
- Settlement Amount: $1,100,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 3 –
- Event Date: 7/11/2013
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLAIMANT ALLEGES UNAUTHORIZED TRADING; EXCESSIVE TRADING; EXCESSIVE COMMISSION; MISREPRESENTATION
- Damage Amount Requested: $983,997.00
- Settlement Amount: $395,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 4 –
- Event Date: 5/7/2013
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: 2012034094001
- DocketNumberAAO: 2012034094001
- Initiated By: FINRA
- Allegations: RESPONDENT MURA FAILED TO RESPOND TO FINRA REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.
- Resolution: LETTER
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent)
- Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: All Capacities
- Duration: Indefinite
- Start Date: 8/12/2013
- Regulator Statement: PURSUANT TO FINRA RULE 9552(H) AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH FINRA’S NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND SUSPENSION FROM ASSOCIATION LETTERS DATED MAY 7, 2013 AND MAY 31, 2013, RESPECTIVELY, ON AUGUST 12, 2013, MURA IS BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY FINRA MEMBER IN ANY CAPACITY. RESPONDENT FAILED TO REQUEST TERMINATION OF HIS SUSPENSION WITHIN THREE MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE NOTICE OF SUSPENSION; THEREFORE, HE IS AUTOMATICALLY BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY FINRA MEMBER IN ANY CAPACITY.
DISCLOSURE 5 –
- Event Date: 3/5/2013
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS, MISREPRESENTATION, NEGLIGENCE BREACH OF CONTRACT AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY.
- Settlement Amount: $80,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 6 –
- Event Date: 9/27/2012
- Disclosure Type: Employment Separation After Allegations
- Disclosure Resolution:
- Disclosure Detail :: Firm Name: AEGIS CAPITAL CORP.
- Termination Type: Discharged
- Allegations: FAILURE TO FULLY DISCLOSE ONGOING REVIEW BY SEC OF OUTSIDE BUSINESS ENTITIES
DISCLOSURE 7 –
- Event Date: 9/24/2012
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA:
- Initiated By: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Allegations: SEC ADMIN RELEASE 34-67920, SEPTEMBER 24, 2012: THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (COMMISSION) DEEMED IT APPROPRIATE AND IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS BE INSTITUTED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(B) AND 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (EXCHANGE ACT), AGAINST DAVID MURA ( ESPONDENT OR MURA). THE DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT ALLEGES THAT MURA VIOLATED SECTION 15(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT BY ACTING AS AN UNREGISTERED BROKER-DEALER IN CONNECTION WITH HIS SOLICITATION OF INVESTORS IN PROMISSORY NOTES (THE LLC PROMISSORY NOTES) ISSUED BY SEVERAL SMALL, RELATED NEW YORK LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (THE LLCS) LOCATED IN PITTSFORD, NEW YORK. WHILE MURA ENGAGED IN THESE SOLICITATION EFFORTS, HE WAS A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE AND BRANCH OFFICE MANAGER OF A BROKER-DEALER REGISTERED WITH THE COMMISSION. DESPITE HIS ASSOCIATION WITH THE BROKER-DEALER, MURA CONDUCTED THE OFFERING OF THE LLC PROMISSORY NOTES OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF HIS EMPLOYMENT WITH THE BROKER-DEALER, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 15(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. MURA ALSO DIRECTED AN INDIVIDUAL, WHO WORKED FOR THE LLCS UNDER MURA’S SUPERVISION, AND AN INVESTOR IN AN LLC PROMISSORY NOTE (INVESTOR 1) TO SOLICIT POTENTIAL INVESTORS AND TO OTHERWISE PARTICIPATE IN THE OFFERING OF THE LLC PROMISSORY NOTES. THE INDIVIDUAL AND INVESTOR 1 BOTH FOLLOWED MURA’S INSTRUCTION, AND SEVERAL INDIVIDUALS WHO WERE SOLICITED BY THE INDIVIDUAL AND/OR INVESTOR 1 EVENTUALLY INVESTED IN THE LLC PROMISSORY NOTES. THROUGH THESE ACTIONS, THE INDIVIDUAL AND INVESTOR 1 VIOLATED SECTION 15(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. AS A RESULT OF THE CONDUCT, RESPONDENT WILLFULLY VIOLATED SECTION 15(A)(1) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND WILLFULLY AIDED, ABETTED AND CAUSED THE INDIVIDUAL’S AND INVESTOR 1’S VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 15(A)(1) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
- Resolution: Order
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent)
- Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: SEE COMMENT SECTION
- Start Date: 12/5/2014 Sanctions: Cease and Desist
- Sanctions: RESPONDENT WILLFULLY VIOLATED SECTION 15(A)(1) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT, AND RESPONDENT WILLFULLY AIDED AND ABETTED AND CAUSED THE INDIVIDUAL’S AND INVESTOR 1’S VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 15(A)(1) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
- Broker Comment: IT IS ORDERED THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE SHALL ISSUE AN INITIAL DECISION NO LATER THAN 300 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER, PURSUANT TO RULE 360(A)(2) OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES OF PRACTICE.
DISCLOSURE 8 –
- Event Date: 6/24/2011
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Pending
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLAIMANTS ALLEGE MISREPRESENTATION, UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS, CHURNING, NEGLIGENCE AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY. CLAIMANT WAS IN COMPLETE CONTROL OF HIS ACCOUNT AT ALL TIMES. CLAIMANT DIRECTED, AUTHORIZED, AND FUNDED EVERY TRANSACTION THAT WAS EXECUTED IN HIS ACCOUNT. THE CLAIMS WILL BE DEFENDED VIGOROUSLY.
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 9 –
- Event Date: 5/24/2001
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIENT COMPLAINING ABOUT A CANCELED TRADE THAT HE DID NOT PAY FOR. THINKS HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SOLD OUT.
- Damage Amount Requested: $25,000.00
- Settlement Amount: $8,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 10 –
- Event Date: 4/20/1979
- Disclosure Type: Criminal
- Disclosure Resolution: Final Disposition
- Disclosure Detail :: Criminal Charges :: Charges: ISSUING BAD CHECK
- Disposition: CHARGES DISMISSED
- Broker Comment: THIS INCIDENT STEMS OUT OF AN AUTOMOTIVE DEALER CHECKING ACCOUNT. I MAINTAINED AT MANUFACTURERS HANOVER BANK. IN 1976 I ISSUED CHECKS FROM THIS ACCOUNT WHICH BOUNCED BECAUSE THE BANK REVERSED A DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY CREDITED TO THE ACCOUNT (OVER 1 YEAR EARLIER) AND DID NOT INFORM ME OF THIS. THIS CHARGE WAS DISMISSED AND I SUBSEQUENTLY SUED THE BANK FOR FALSE ARREST. THIS MATTER WAS SETTLED AND I WASPAID 11,000 BY THE BANK (SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS). THIS MATTER SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM MY CRD AS IT CLEARLY DOES NOT SHOW AS A CRIMINAL MATTER ON MY RECORD WITH CITY OF ROCHESTER (SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT).
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Previous Associations
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- AEGIS CAPITAL CORP. (CRD#: 15007) :: 4/28/2011 – 10/1/2012 :: ROCHESTER, NY
- J.P. TURNER & COMPANY, L.L.C. (CRD#: 43177) :: 9/30/2002 – 4/27/2011 :: PITTSFORD, NY
- SCHNEIDER SECURITIES, INC. (CRD#: 16434) :: 11/4/1998 – 9/30/2002 :: DENVER, CO
- H.J. MEYERS & CO., INC. (CRD#: 15609) :: 5/11/1992 – 10/5/1998 :: ROCHESTER, NY
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including David James Mura, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Sometimes investment losses occur because advisors, stockbrokers, and even brokerage firms, commit fraud. Massimo Vignelli
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report David Mura
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
David James Mura – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (2238675) for the broker – David James Mura
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘The Skeptic Files,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.
To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/david-james-mura/.
