David John Dewald – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with David John Dewald.
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to David John Dewald. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About David Dewald
David John Dewald is an Investment Adviser. David John Dewald’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 2782171 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/2782171.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for David John Dewald.
David John Dewald has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of David John Dewald’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 7/19/2010
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: 2009019041601
- DocketNumberAAO: 2009019041601
- Initiated By: FINRA
- Allegations: FINRA RULES 2010, 8210, NASD RULES 2110, 2210(B)1, 2210(D)1(A), 2210(D)1(B), 2310, 3040: DEWALD PARTICIPATED IN PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS WITHOUT GIVING HIS MEMBER FIRM WRITTEN NOTICE OF HIS INTENTIONS AND RECEIVING APPROVAL. HE SOLD INSTALLMENT PLAN CONTRACTS OFFERED BY A TENNESSEE NON-PROFIT CORPORATION THAT REPRESENTED ITSELF TO THE PUBLIC AS A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION. THE COMPANY’S INSTALLMENT PLAN CONTRACTS PROMISED A TAX DEDUCTION, AS WELL AS FIXED DEFERRED PAYMENTS AT AN UNSPECIFIED RATE OF RETURN, IN EXCHANGE FOR EACH CUSTOMER’S TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF EXISTING ANNUITIES TO THE COMPANY. THE COMPANY CLAIMED TO HOLD A TAX EXEMPT STATUS BUT ITS APPLICATION WAS NEVER APPROVED BY THE IRS. ACCORDINGLY, CUSTOMERS WHO PURCHASED THE INSTALLMENT PLAN CONTRACTS WERE UNABLE TO CLAIM A TAX DEDUCTION IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR INVESTMENTS. DEWALD MADE UNSUITABLE RECOMMENDATIONS TO CUSTOMERS GIVEN HIS COMPLETE FAILURE TO PERFORM A REASONABLE INVESTIGATION CONCERNING THE PRODUCT. WHILE REVIEWING THE PRODUCT INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY’S WEBSITE, HE TOOK ITS REPRESENTATIONS FOR FACE VALUE AND FAILED TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THOSE REPRESENTATIONS. SPECIFICALLY, DEWALD DID NOT CONDUCT ADDITIONAL INTERNET RESEARCH, INVESTIGATE WHETHER THE COMPANY WAS REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN HIS HOME STATE, OR CONTACT THE IRS TO CONFIRM THE COMPANY’S TAX EXEMPT STATUS OR THE AVAILABILITY OF A TAX DEDUCTION TO INVESTORS. DEWALD PROVIDED CUSTOMERS WITH ILLUSTRATIONS AND OTHER SALES MATERIALS PRODUCED BY THE COMPANY THAT CONTAINED MISLEADING AND INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. THE MATERIALS FAILED TO REFLECT THAT THE TOTAL PAYOUT AMOUNT INCLUDES A RETURN OF PRINCIPAL AND DID NOT SPECIFY THE RATE OF RETURN. THE DESCRIPTIONS CONCERNING TAX DEDUCTIONS AND TAX SAVINGS WERE OVERSIMPLIFIED, INCOMPLETE, AND MISLEADING. HE FAILED TO PRESENT THESE MATERIALS TO A REGISTERED PRINCIPAL AT HIS MEMBER FIRM FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO USING THEM IN CONNECTION WITH HIS SALES OF THE INSTALLMENT PLAN CONTRACTS. DEWALD MISREPRESENTED TO CUSTOMERS THAT THEY COULD TAKE CHARITABLE TAX DEDUCTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR INVESTMENTS, WHICH WAS NOT TRUE. THE COMPANY WAS PLACED IN RECEIVERSHIP BY THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, AND LATER INTO LIQUIDATION, AND DEWALD’S CUSTOMERS INITIALLY LOST ALL OR MOST OF THEIR INVESTMENT, THOUGH 79% WAS RETURNED PURSUANT TO THE LIQUIDATION. IN ADDITION, DEWALD FAILED TO RESPOND TO FINRA REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS.
- Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent)
- Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: All Capacities
- Duration: Indefinite
- Start Date: 7/19/2010 Sanctions: Restitution
- Sanction Details :: Amount: $124,516.03
- Regulator Statement: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, DEWALD CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE HE IS BARRED FROM ASSOCATION WITH ANY FINRA MEMBER IN ANY CAPACITY AND ORDERED TO PAY RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $124,516.03 PLUS INTEREST. RESTITUTION AMOUNTS ORDERED, PURSUANT TO THIS DISCIPLINARY ACTION, ARE DUE AND PAYABLE IMMEDIATELY UPON REASSOCIATION WITH A MEMBER FIRM OR PRIOR TO ANY APPLICATION OR REQUEST FROM ANY STATUTORY DISQUALIFICATION RESULTING FROM THIS OR ANY OTHER EVENT OR PROCEEDING, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. IF FOR ANY REASON RESPONDENT CANNOT LOCATE ANY CUSTOMER AFTER REASONABLE AND DOCUMENTED EFFORTS WITHIN SUCH PERIOD, OR SUCH ADDITIONAL PERIOD AGREED TO BY FINRA, RESPONDENT SHALL FORWARD ANY UNDISTRIBUTED RESTITUTION AND INTEREST TO THE APPROPRIATE ESCHEAT, UNCLAIMED PROPERTY, OR ABANDONED PROPERTY FUND FOR THE STATE IN WHICH THE CUSTOMER IS LAST KNOWN TO HAVE RESIDED.
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- SUMMIT BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC. (CRD#: 34643) :: 4/14/2008 – 7/28/2008 :: KELLER, TX
- MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED (CRD#: 8209) :: 4/2/2007 – 4/29/2008 :: ARLINGTON, TX
- MORGAN STANLEY DW INC. (CRD#: 7556) :: 5/21/2004 – 4/2/2007 :: ARLINGTON, TX
- BANC OF AMERICA INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. (CRD#: 16361) :: 10/19/2000 – 6/10/2004 :: BOSTON, MA
- BANC ONE SECURITIES CORPORATION (CRD#: 16999) :: 3/20/1999 – 10/3/2000 :: CHICAGO, IL
- CADARET, GRANT & CO., INC. (CRD#: 10641) :: 6/23/1997 – 2/26/1999 :: SYRACUSE, NY
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including David John Dewald, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report David Dewald
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
David John Dewald – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (2782171) for the broker – David John Dewald
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘The Skeptic Files,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.
To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/david-john-dewald/.