Jeffery Scott Preston – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Jeffery Scott Preston.
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Jeffery Scott Preston. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About Jeffery Preston
Jeffery Scott Preston is an Investment Adviser. Jeffery Scott Preston’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 2167254 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/2167254.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Jeffery Scott Preston.
Jeffery Scott Preston has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of Jeffery Scott Preston’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 10/13/2017
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA:
- Initiated By: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Allegations: IA Release 40-4795, October 13, 2017: The SEC deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 against Jeffery S. Preston. In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these proceedings, and the findings contained herein, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions. On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that on August 13, 2013, a judgment was entered by consent against Preston, permanently enjoining him from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act, in the Civil Action Number CV-10-4769, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
- Resolution: Order
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent)
- Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: Any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or NRSRO
- Duration: Indefinite
- Start Date: 10/13/2017
DISCLOSURE 2 –
- Event Date: 6/28/2010
- Disclosure Type: Civil
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: Initiated By: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Allegations: SEC LITIGATION RELEASE 21582, JUNE 29, 2010: THE SEC (OR COMMISSION) FILED A COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT JEFFERY S. PRESTON AND HIS FIRM, ALLEGING VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 10(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND RULE 10B-5 THEREUNDER AND SECTIONS 206(1) AND 206(2) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940. THE COMMISSION’S COMPLAINT CHARGED PRESTON AND HIS INVESTMENT ADVISORY FIRM WITH FRAUD AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY FOR PLACING CLIENTS IN UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS AND MISREPRESENTING AND FAILING TO DISCLOSE THE RISKS OF THESE INVESTMENTS. THE COMMISSION ALLEGES THAT PRESTON AND HIS FIRM INVESTED $6.9 MILLION OF CLIENT FUNDS IN UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTES ISSUED BY A REAL ESTATE COMPANY THAT BUYS AND RENOVATES DISTRESSED PROPERTIES AND IS HEADQUARTERED IN IRVINE, CALIF. BEGINNING IN OR ABOUT OCTOBER 2005, PRESTON RECOMMENDED THE NOTES TO HIS CLIENTS EVEN THOUGH THE NOTES WERE NOT SUITABLE TO THE CLIENTS’ RISK TOLERANCES. PRESTON ALSO CHARACTERIZED THE NOTES AS A SOLID AND STRONG INVESTMENT WITHOUT DISCLOSING THE RISKS INHERENT IN AN UNSECURED LOAN. THE REAL ESTATE COMPANY DEFAULTED ON ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING NOTES IN SEPTEMBER 2007, WHICH AMOUNTED TO ALMOST TOTAL LOSSES FOR PRESTON’S CLIENTS. ACCORDING TO THE SEC’S COMPLAINT, PRESTON RECOMMENDED THE REAL ESTATE COMPANY’S UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTES TO HIS CLIENTS DESPITE THE FACT THAT IN JULY 2005, HIS FIRM’S ATTORNEY HAD CAUTIONED HIM ABOUT THE ENORMOUS RISK OF SUCH AN INVESTMENT. NEVERTHELESS, NOT ONLY DID PRESTON RECOMMEND THE NOTES TO CLIENTS, HE ALSO FALSELY REASSURED CLIENTS THAT THEIR PRINCIPAL WOULD BE SAFE. EVEN THOUGH PRESTON BEGAN TO DOUBT THE VIABILITY OF THE REAL ESTATE COMPANY IN EARLY 2007, HE DID NOT DISCLOSE HIS CONCERNS TO HIS CLIENTS. PRESTON THEN REDEEMED HIS OWN UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE SEVERAL WEEKS BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE COMPANY DEFAULTED ON ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING NOTES. EVEN AFTER THE REAL ESTATE COMPANY DEFAULTED ON THE NOTES, PRESTON PERSUADED THREE OF HIS CLIENTS TO INVEST $235,000 IN UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTES ISSUED BY THE REAL ESTATE COMPANY. IN ADDITION, PRESTON RECOMMENDED THE NOTES TO CLIENTS EVEN THOUGH THE INVESTMENT WAS HIGHLY UNSUITABLE FOR MANY OF THEM, SUCH AS ONE CLIENT WHO INVESTED 86.2 PER CENT OF HER TOTAL NET WORTH IN THE NOTES.
- Resolution: Judgment Rendered
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Injunction
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- NATIONAL PLANNING CORPORATION (CRD#: 29604) :: 1/15/2004 – 7/22/2004 :: LOS ANGELES, CA
- SIGNATOR INVESTORS, INC. (CRD#: 468) :: 11/1/1991 – 1/26/2004 :: BOSTON, MA
- JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (CRD#: 5181) :: 11/1/1991 – 5/1/1997 :: BOSTON, MA
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Jeffery Scott Preston, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report Jeffery Preston
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
Jeffery Scott Preston – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (2167254) for the broker – Jeffery Scott Preston
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘The Skeptic Files,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.
To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/jeffery-scott-preston/.