Peter Michael Patterson – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Peter Michael Patterson.
The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient… Warren Buffet
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Peter Michael Patterson. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About Peter Patterson
Peter Michael Patterson is an Investment Adviser. Peter Michael Patterson’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 357964 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/357964.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Peter Michael Patterson.
Peter Michael Patterson has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of Peter Michael Patterson’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 7/16/2001
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIENT ALLEGATIONS INCLUDED UNAUTORIZED TRANSACTIONS,EXCESSIVE TRADING,UNAUTHORIZED WITHDRAWLS,AND SPECULATVE TRADING WITHOUT CLIENT CONSENT
- Damage Amount Requested: $250,000.00
- Settlement Amount: $250,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 2 –
- Event Date: 9/18/1998
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Denied
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: UNSUITABLE AND UNAUTHORIZED TRASNACTIONS. CUSTOMER WAS SEEKING $135,000 IN DAMAGES, REPRESENTING ALLEGED LOSSES, ATTORNEY’S FEES, PUNITIVE DAMAGES, AND RETURNS ON THE INVESTMENTS.
- Damage Amount Requested: $135,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
- Broker Comment: THE ALLEGATIONS WERE INVESTIGATED AND DETERMINED TO BE MERITLESS. MR PATTERSON EMPHATICALLYS DENIES ALL OF THE ALLEGATIONS.
DISCLOSURE 3 –
- Event Date: 8/1/1987
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: ALLEGATIONS WERE CHURNING AND UNSUITABILITY BROUGHT AGAINST DEAN WITTER AND ME. THE ORIGINAL CLAIM WAS FOR $350.000.
- Damage Amount Requested: $350,000.00
- Settlement Amount: $150,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
- Broker Comment: DEAN WITTER PAID [CUSTOMER $150,000. DEAN WITTER PAID ALL MY LEGAL COSTS. THERE WAS NO FINE, NO SUSPENSION OR RESTRICTION OF ANY KIND. [CUSTOMER WAS AN ACTIVE, KNOWLEDGEABLE, HANDS ON PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR WHOSE EXPRESSED GOAL WAS TO RUN HIS ACCOUNT UP TO A MILLION DOLLARS, THROUGH SHORT TERM TRADING OF LARGE BLOCKS OF STOCK. HE KEPT CONSTANT TRACK OF ALL TRANSACTIONS, PROFITS, LOSSES, AND COMMISSIONS. THE EQUITY IN HIS ACCOUNT FLUCTUATED WILDLY AS HE MADE AND LOST LARGE SUMS OF MONEY FROM FEBRUARY 1982 THROUGH MAY 1986 AND NEVER COMPLAINED UNTIL ONE WEEK IN MAY OF 1986. HE LOST $114,000 ON A BLOCK OF PURCHASE OF 10,000 SHARES OF IOMEGA CORP., A STOCK HE HAD SELECTED. [CUSTOMER ALSO DEMANDED AND RECEIVED DEEP COMMISSIONS DISCOUNTS. AFTER 4-1/2 YEARS OF CLOSELY MONITORING THE ACTIVITY WITH NO COMPLAINT, HE HAD THE TEMERITY TO CLAIM THAT THE ACTIVITY WAS NOT ACCORDING TO HIS WISHES. ALL EVIDENCE CLEARLY SHOWS THE ALLEGATIONS ARE BASELESS AND WITHOUT MERIT.
DISCLOSURE 4 –
- Event Date: 12/1/1984
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: [CUSTOMER SUED ME INDIVIDUALLY. HE ALLEGED CHURNING, UNSUITABILITY AND FRAUD. HE LOST $32,000 AND SUED ME FOR $450,000/THIS SUIT WAS A PERSONAL VENDETTA BY [CUSTOMER.
- Damage Amount Requested: $450,000.00
- Settlement Amount: $47,500.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
- Broker Comment: I SETTLED WITH [CUSTOMER OUT OF COURT FOR $47,500/I HAVE PAID 100% OF LEGAL FEES IN EXCESS OF $125,000. THERE HAVE BEEN NO SUSPENSIONS FINES OR RESTRICTIONS. I RECEIVED A LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT FROM THE NYSE IN MAY 1990 A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED. [CUSTOMER IS A VERY WEALTHY, HARVARD EDUCATED BUSINESS LAWYER FROM NASHUA, N.H. HE HAD BEEN TRADING SECURITIES FOR OVER 25 YEARS AND HAD A HISTORY OF HISTORY OF ASSERTING CLAIMS AGAINST BROKERS. [CUSTOMER SUED ME WHEN HIS INVESTMENT IN MCI CORP. DROPPED DRAMATICALLY IN 1984. I HAD BEEN HIS BROKER FOR 10 YEARS PRECEDING THIS EVENT WITH NO COMPLAINTS. [CUSTOMER TRANSFERRED SEVERAL ACCOUNTS WITH ME OVER THE YEARS. HIS KEOUGH ACCOUNT WAS HIS OWN TRADING VEHICLE WHILE $150,000 PLUS WAS INVESTED IN BLUE CHIPS AND MUNICIPAL BONDS. HE WAS EXTREMELY IMPATIENT WITH ALL TRADES. HE SAID HIS KEOUGH WAS NOT HIS EST EGG. HE ESTABLISHED A PATTERN OF TRADING STOCKS FOR SHORT TERM GAINS AND DID SO FOR 6 YEARS WITHOUT ANY COMPLAINTS. OVER THE YEARS, HE RECOMMENDED ME TO MANY OF HIS FRIENDS. BEFORE HIS SUIT, [CUSTOMER AND I WERE CLOSE PERSONAL FRIENDS. THE EMOTIONAL STRESS AND STRAIN OF YEARS OF THIS
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Previous Associations
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- VALIC FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC. (CRD#: 42803) :: 8/24/2010 – 7/26/2019 :: ORLANDO, FL
- H.C. WAINWRIGHT & CO., INC. (CRD#: 375) :: 6/27/1994 – 8/24/2001 :: NEW YORK, NY
- SMITH BARNEY INC. (CRD#: 7059) :: 6/20/1991 – 7/12/1994 :: NEW YORK, NY
- ADVEST, INC. (CRD#: 10) :: 3/10/1989 – 6/11/1991 :: HARTFORD, CT
- DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. (CRD#: 7556) :: 12/30/1982 – 2/14/1989
- MOSELEY, HALLGARTEN, ESTABROOK & WEEDEN, INC. (CRD#: 7908) :: 6/29/1979 – 12/2/1982
- DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT INCORPORATED (CRD#: 7323) :: 1/6/1977 – 8/18/1979
- DREXEL BURNHAM & CO. INCORPORATED (CRD#: 7013) :: 2/6/1976 – 1/6/1977
- DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT INCORPORATED (CRD#: 7323) :: 8/16/1974 – 2/6/1976
- MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. (CRD#: 572) :: 4/10/1972 – 9/26/1974
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Peter Michael Patterson, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Sometimes investment losses occur because advisors, stockbrokers, and even brokerage firms, commit fraud. Massimo Vignelli
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report Peter Patterson
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
Peter Michael Patterson – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (357964) for the broker – Peter Michael Patterson
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘The Skeptic Files,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.
To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/peter-michael-patterson/.
