Randy Warren Burke – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Randy Warren Burke.
The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient… Warren Buffet
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Randy Warren Burke. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About Randy Burke
Randy Warren Burke is an Investment Adviser. Randy Warren Burke’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 2702441 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/2702441.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Randy Warren Burke.
Randy Warren Burke has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of Randy Warren Burke’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 12/24/2020
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Suitability & Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Negligence Date was sometime in 2012
- Damage Amount Requested: $40,000.00
- Settlement Amount: $14,999.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 2 –
- Event Date: 7/30/2017
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Closed-No Action
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Misrepresentation 2009 – 2013
- Damage Amount Requested: $102,417.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 3 –
- Event Date: 10/21/2015
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: 2015044129701
- DocketNumberAAO: 2015044129701
- Initiated By: FINRA
- Allegations: Without admitting or denying the findings, Burke consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he participated in private securities transactions without first providing written notice to his member firms, or obtaining the firms’ approval. An elderly customer, with one of the firms, made investments in Burke’s private securities transactions and Burke participated in the customer’s investments activities with the venture’s activities. However, both firms prohibited registered representatives from participating in private securities transactions without providing prior written notice of the transactions to the firm and obtaining firm approval. The findings stated that Burke made material misrepresentations and omissions in connection with the sale of the private securities in willful violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Burke failed to disclose to the elderly customer relevant material facts about her private securities investments. In addition, Burke made false representations to the customer that as a membership unit holder of the private securities she would be entitled to a percentage of the profit from a future sale of a lodge property. This statement was false because the private venture was not a party to the share purchase agreement and never had an ownership interest in the lodge. Burke also represented to the customer that the private securities venture was raising up to one million dollars by selling membership units. This statement was false because no additional investors were solicited or invested in the private securities venture. The findings also stated that Burke improperly used customer funds. The customer invested $38,407.37 in the venture in exchange for a corresponding number of membership units. Burke represented, and the customer expected, that her investment funds were to be used for general lodge operating expenses. Burke deposited $38,000 of the investment into a business checking account that he held jointly with his wife that was used for business and personal banking. However, following the deposit of the customer’s investment funds into Burke’s account, Burke’s personal expenditures from the account exceeded his business-related expenditures, resulting in his use of a portion of the investment funds for personal expenses. The findings also included that contrary to the firms’ policies, Burke failed to disclose in writing or obtain approval from his firms for his involvement in an outside business activity. FINRA found that Burke provided false answers in response to his firms’ annual certifications on compliance questionnaires regarding his participation in private securities transactions and his involvement in an outside business activity.
- Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent)
- Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: All Capacities
- Start Date: 10/21/2015
- Sanctions: Respondent understands that this settlement includes a finding that he willfully violated Section 10(b) and Rules 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that under Article III, Section 4 of FINRA’s By-Laws, this makes Respondent subject to a statutory disqualification with respect to association with a member.
DISCLOSURE 4 –
- Event Date: 5/1/2015
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLAIMANT(S) ALLEGED INVESTMENTS WERE MADE INTO AN ENTITY CALLED LODGE ALASKA, LLC WERE FRAUDULENT IN THAT FUNDS WERE UTILIZED BY DEFENDANT BURKE FOR PERSONAL USE.
- Damage Amount Requested: $38,407.00
- Settlement Amount: $10,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 5 –
- Event Date: 1/27/2015
- Disclosure Type: Financial
- Disclosure Resolution: Pending
- Disclosure Detail :: Type: Bankruptcy
DISCLOSURE 6 –
- Event Date: 12/12/2014
- Disclosure Type: Judgment / Lien
- Disclosure Resolution:
- Disclosure Detail :: Judgment/Lien Amount: $11,280.01
- Judgment/Lien Type: Tax
- Broker Comment: PENDING BANKRUPTCY PLAN
DISCLOSURE 7 –
- Event Date: 7/24/2013
- Disclosure Type: Judgment / Lien
- Disclosure Resolution:
- Disclosure Detail :: Judgment/Lien Amount: $49,430.10
- Judgment/Lien Type: Tax
- Broker Comment: BLACK LUNG CLAIM FORM 1995 COAL BUSINESS. I HAVE NO IDEA AS TO WHAT THE RESOLUTION MAY BE.
DISCLOSURE 8 –
- Event Date: 1/30/2013
- Disclosure Type: Judgment / Lien
- Disclosure Resolution:
- Disclosure Detail :: Judgment/Lien Amount: $51,215.96
- Judgment/Lien Type: Civil
- Broker Comment: COLLECTION IS STAYED BY BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS.
DISCLOSURE 9 –
- Event Date: 11/21/2006
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Settled
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: UNSUITABLE RECOMMENDATIONS AND MISREPRESENTATIONS
- Damage Amount Requested: $256,094.00
- Settlement Amount: $264,577.00
- Broker Comment: THE REP FEELS THAT HE PUT THE [CUSTOMERS INTO AN INVESTMENT, AT THAT TIME, SUITABLE FOR MORE INTEREST INCOME THAN THE CURRENT INVESTMENT THEY HAD. BY CHANGING THEM FROM A 3% DIVIDEND TO A 7% DIVIDEND WOULD BRING THEM MORE MONEY FOR THEIR RETIREMMENT PORTFOLIO. BECAUSE OF THE DIFFERENCE IN THE PERCENTAGE RATE OF THE NEW INVESTMENT. THE REP FEELS THAT THERE IS A MISUNDERSTANDING ABOUT THE TIME FRAME CONCERNING THE SURRENDER CHARGES, AND THE CLIENT IS UNWILLING TO ACCEPT THE CHARGES FOR THE LIQUIDATION OF THE INVESTEMNT.
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Previous Associations
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- CALTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. (CRD#: 20999) :: 9/6/2013 – 10/19/2015 :: HICKORY, NC
- CAPITAL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. (CRD#: 14752) :: 4/5/2011 – 9/11/2013 :: HICKORY, NC
- SYNERGY INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC (CRD#: 46035) :: 2/15/2002 – 4/4/2011 :: FERGUSON, NC
- PRUCO SECURITIES CORPORATION (CRD#: 5685) :: 2/7/1996 – 10/3/2001 :: NEWARK, NJ
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Randy Warren Burke, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Sometimes investment losses occur because advisors, stockbrokers, and even brokerage firms, commit fraud. Massimo Vignelli
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report Randy Burke
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
Randy Warren Burke – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (2702441) for the broker – Randy Warren Burke
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘The Skeptic Files,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.
To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/randy-warren-burke/.
