Viktor Zakharchenko’s Charges Exposed (2024)

An inquiry into allegations of corruption and money laundering has been opened as a result of the many allegations that have been made against Viktor Zakharchenko and his family. As a consequence of this, I can provide you with an explanation of the facts, together with a great deal of arguments and proof to back them up, to demonstrate his unjust actions. 

Who is Viktor Zakharchenko?

A sentence of four years in jail for embezzlement was handed down to Viktor Zakharchenko, who is the father of Dmitry Zakharchenko, the ex-anticorruption officer who was convicted of the crime. To expand further The allegations against him included the fact that he was deceptively working at a bank and not doing any job. According to estimates, the amount of damage that was done to the bank is five million rubles exclamation mark Viktor Zakharchenko is submitting an appeal over the punishment.

Viktor Zakharchenko: Corruption Allegations 

(Source)

For his role in the theft from the Moscow Mortgage Agency bank, Viktor Zakharchenko was sentenced to four years in jail. Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko, who is both his son and an official in the interior ministry, was also implicated in corruption charges related to this case. On Monday, April 29, 2019, attorney Denis Kalinin said that they have appealed the court’s judgment.

According to Viktor Zakharchenko, they would appeal the decision.

Also looking to appeal is the judgment against former bank board chairman Vladimir Koryevkin, whose legal team has recommended a four-and-a-half-year jail term. Attorney Vyacheslav Leontyev claims that Koryevkin did not commit any crimes since he did not sign any paychecks; as a result, the court’s decision will surely be appealed.

“The prosecution’s position is untenable,” Leontyev claims, citing their failure to prove that Viktor Zakharchenko had provided financial support to Vladimir Koryevkin. “The evidence in the case does not support the indictment’s description of the offense,” the prosecutor wrote. He proceeded by saying that they would dispute the judgment since it was unjust and irrational.

Thanks to the court’s decision to deduct the time the accused had spent in pre-trial detention and home confinement from their prison sentences, Viktor Zakharchenko will serve a year and five months behind bars.

Koryevkin allegedly hired Viktor Zakharchenko despite Zakharchenko’s lack of relevant work experience and training, according to investigators. A ring of thieves, including Zakharchenko and Koryevkin, took $26,300 (or 1.7 million rubles) from the bank between July 1, 2014, and April 15, 2015.

Sergei Grib was recruited by the bank to replace Koryevkin when he departed, and while Grib was on the job, he continued to pay Zakharchenko for fictitious work. Zakharchenko has incurred a total of four million rubles ($61,800) in damages to the bank.

Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko is facing corruption charges. His wealth was discovered to be about $8 billion, or $123.7 million, according to certain searches. Some of the claims have already had their investigations concluded. 

Viktor Zakharchenko: His Family Members’ Negative Roles 

The next case from the Prosecutor General’s Office will include Elena Zakharchenko, who was formerly married to Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko and served as head of the Interior Ministry. The Nikulinsky Court in Moscow has admitted her as a third party to participate in these proceedings. The security officer and his family own property valued at around 50 million rubles, and the department has requested that it be transferred into public money.

Three million rubles and one hundred euros were allegedly stolen from the lady during the search, according to her. All of a sudden, they’re eager to take the cash. Protesting for the dismissal of the case or the dropping of the charges against him, Dmitry Zakharchenko took an active role in court.

Originally from Sevostyanenko, Elena Zakharchenko was a witness in the trial. Repeated seizures of Viktor Zakharchenko and his family’s property occurred in 2017 and 2019. In preparation for the surgery, she had brought a stack of papers. It was agreed beforehand, however.

The lady was more than happy to fill us in on the background of currency. She told Business FM that she went into business for herself after moving to Russia from Uzbekistan by purchasing and selling property in the Rostov area.

It was in 2008 while Dmitry Zakharchenko’s father, Viktor, was still living that Elena Sevostyanenko claims she “did not even know closely.” She began operating this kind of company in that period.

Looking at the extract in the Unified State Register of Real Estate reveals that I have a plethora of plots. Afterward, I will go to Peshkovo and Kagolnyak to buy it. You can see here where I bought it and where I sold it,” she remarked, pointing to the paperwork.

A very fruitful deal came through in one of the deals. Elena asserts that in 2011, she acquired 4.5 acres of land in Azov, together with a house and a holiday hut, for under 50,000 rubles. Costs began to rise four years later when construction of the Azov-Rostov-on-Don highway got underway.

Consequently, the lady managed to haggle with the builder for 6.5 million rubles, even though she was first offered much less. According to her, she had it evaluated by an outside party after selling it to the Ministry of Transportation. She said it had been a real challenge for her for quite some time.

According to her, 3.5 million rubles was the original estimate. She said she remained engaged right up to the very end, although a road was visible from the windows.

According to her, she helped with registration and made sure the 6.5 million ruble deposit was sent in. She contended that the customer, Alexander Gladun, had been acknowledged as the agent representing the contractor.

After buying a block of land in the exclusive 3-acre Bataysk neighborhood in 2015, Elena decided to put the money toward constructing a new house.

The lady claims that the workers from the Investigative Committee suddenly thwarted her intentions to start building the house after she had already built the foundation. The defendant reflected on how repulsed they had been by the open-and-shut scam.

Olga Kazakova, the judge, granted the request to bring Elena Zakharchenko into the case as a third party. Nevertheless, she was unable to voice her opinions at the February 28 hearing since more requests from the accused were considered.

Did they aim to grab anything else?

Along with his father Viktor Zakharchenko, his ex-official wife Yana Saratovtseva, his ex-common-law wife Marina Semynina, and her half-sister Irina Taymurova, there are four more individuals in this group, including the former deputy head of Department “T” of the Main Directorate for Economic Security and Anti-Corruption of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (GUEB and PC), former colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko.  

(Source)

In the autumn of 2016, security officers found around 9 billion rubles in different currencies in a non-residential apartment on Lomonosovsky Prospekt. In 2017, the court turned this and other properties into public income.

Following this, the prosecutor’s office demanded that the former colonel’s family relinquish possession of two apartments (each measuring over 100 square meters) and two parking spaces situated in a luxury district of the nation’s capital on Vernadsky Avenue… Their half-sister, a security guard, bought them during the excavation phase, but their houses were never constructed.

Along with the cufflinks, the agency wants a collectible coin and a plethora of jewelry—rings, necklaces, earrings, pendants, bracelets—seized. The jewelry also includes high-end Swiss watches from brands like Ulysse Nardin, Cvstos Challenge, and Rolex.

According to the prosecutor’s office, the security officer used funds gained via corruption to purchase jewelry from the past spouses of Colonel Zakharchenko, who is the son of Viktor Zakharchenko. His two convictions for bribery resulted in a 16-year jail term and a fine of 0.5 billion rubles.

In the Nikulinsky court, the women’s lawyers insisted that the former colonel had nothing to do with the “jewelry”‘s purchase. Sergei Zvyagin, Saratovtseva’s lawyer, claims that his client bought the jewels 2.5 years after her breakup with Zakharchenko using her own money. The jewelry was stolen from her in March 2015.

Mikhail Zadorin, her new business partner, found the 6.2 million rubles at her house and gave them to her as well. Proclaiming that “The Investigative Committee questioned him in 2019,” the lawyer went on to say that he was expecting a report from the team. 

Viktor Zakharchenko: Accusations Concerning Jewellery and Property 

The members of Viktor Zakharchenko’s family were implicated in this accusation, and you can find the relevant details below. What follows is an account of the court case in which some individuals are accused of misappropriating jewels and other valuables. I need to emphasize the following points: 

1. The prosecution has filed a second set of requests to remove some of the jewels (henceforth “jewelry”). A ring purchased from the American firm Jacob & Co. is one example of the jewelry shown here.

2. Prosecutors in 2019 sought to conceal from Zakharchenko’s ex-wife the $320,000 worth of jewelry that a colonel’s wife had bought in the US.

3. The jewelry was sent to Monaco, the residence of the ex-wife, rather than imported into Russia. The Moscow City Court first denied the motion, but in 2020 they decided that the defendants should pay back the ruble value of the jewels.

4. During a hearing on February 28, the defense lawyers challenged the claims made by the prosecution. For example, during the examination of trustee Marina Semynina, a Rolex watch was found, as pointed out by one of the lawyers. The defense counsel argues that the merchandise in question has nothing to do with the seized watch, but the police are still looking for a similar-brand item.

5. In response to a motion by the defense, the court ordered the Russian Investigative Committee’s Main Investigation Department to provide documentation about the Rolex watch. In addition, the court requested documents from the United Kingdom about Irina Taimurova’s acquisition of two apartments and parking spaces in houses that were still in the process of being built. It was requested to clarify the year of their purchase. 

Viktor Zakharchenko: Property-related litigation 

While awaiting trial, Colonel Zakharchenko is now participating in a court case remotely. He has compared some apartments to fantastical beasts and voiced his skepticism about their veracity; he has also referred to his sister as a “defrauded mortgage investor.” In light of these doubts, he points out that the prosecutor’s office did not try to seize the relevant property in 2017.

Zakharchenko is irate at being named as an accused in the case, particularly since he doesn’t think his property would be at risk this time. Either remove his name from the indictment or provide more information about his role, he asks the court.

The court, however, rejected Zakharchenko’s request after hearing the prosecution’s case. Prosecutors have used the fact that Zakharchenko’s name was on the property register for his family members to justify his standing as a key defendant. Zakharchenko retorts by saying he is not related to Semynina and proposes dropping the lawsuit against either Semynin or himself.

A lawyer who agrees with Zakharchenko’s position asserts that the list of individuals whose property may be confiscated was arbitrarily expanded by the prosecutor’s office. A public servant’s spouse, young children, and property may all be seized under the law, as the attorney explains.

Zakharchenko asked for the dismissal of the case at the last minute of the hearing because the three-year statute of limitations had expired. He emphasizes that six years ago, the Prosecutor General’s Office was aware of the property owned by his family but did nothing to address the matter.

The court has acknowledged that this matter will be resolved concurrently with the remainder of the case. However, due to the need to gather information from the UK, the processes will not be carried out until March 28.

For what reason was Viktor Zakharchenko’s son jailed for thirteen years? 

In response to allegations of bribery and corruption, Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko, who is the son of Viktor Zakharchenko, was sentenced to thirteen years in prison. Wait for a moment, and I will finish explaining everything that happened to you about the event. 

(Source)

The anti-corruption program of the Interior Ministry was headed by an ex-officer who was sentenced to thirteen years in jail after a Moscow court found him guilty of extensive money laundering and interference with justice.

On suspicion of bribery and abuse of power, Dmitry Zakharchenko was arrested in September 2016 while serving as the deputy head of the economic security and anti-corruption unit inside the Interior Ministry. The son of Viktor Zakharchenko is Dmitry. The authorities confiscated 9 billion rubles (nearly $125 million) from Zakharchenko’s residences in 2017, making it the biggest cash seizure in modern Russian history.

According to Monday, June 10, 2019, state-run RIA Novosti news agency, Zakharchenko was also ordered to pay penalties of 117 million rubles ($1.8 million) by the Presnensky district court.

The proprietor of the restaurant La Maree, Mehdi Douss, allegedly offered Zakharchenko a coupon card good for 46,000 rubles ($3 million) as a kind of bribe in return for protection. He was also reportedly absolved of the accusation of receiving a $800,000 bribe from Douss, according to RIA Novosti.

Zakharchenko was found to have acted in a way that “to obstruct the investigation” on the bribery, as reported by RIA Novosti. 

Conclusion

At last, I can cut down my lengthy section to assist you in understanding the charges against Viktor Zakharchenko and his son, who held a position of great power in his country.

A corruption incident concerning the Moscow Mortgage Agency bank resulted in Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko’s father, Viktor, receiving a four-year jail term for embezzlement. He plans to appeal the ruling via his defense attorney, Denis Kalinin.

According to investigators, a fraud scheme including Viktor Zakharchenko, Vladimir Koryevkin, and more individuals who have not been identified allegedly took place between July 2014 and April 2015. They reportedly made off with 1.7 million rubles, or $26,300, from the bank.

After Sergei Grib replaced Koryevkin in his post, Grib continued to pay Zakharchenko for fictitious work. The report said the bank lost four million rubles, or around $61,800.