Originally Syndicated on June 6, 2024 @ 8:50 am
A verdict of guilty was reached on the allegations of sexual battery by misleading representation, which was brought against Dr. Manfred Alkhas, the owner of Good Life Chiropractic located at 280 E. Hamilton Avenue. Let’s proceed with our investigation into the history of the cases that Dr. Manfred Alkhas has been working on.
Dr. Manfred Alkhas: What exactly occurred in the Allegations?
Dr. Manfred, 49, of Campbell, California, started seeing patients again on Tuesday, November 22, 2016, at his Good Life Chiropractic office, which is situated in a strip mall off Hamilton Avenue. This was four months after he was found guilty of criminal sexual battery.
In the words of Campbell Police Captain Gary Berg, “There were concerns about returning an individual, regardless of who it is, to the circumstance in which they found themselves at the time of the crime.”
On July 3, 2013, the Campbell Police Department began investigating allegations that a chiropractor had engaged in sexual assault and had used an item to puncture someone. Investigations led to the conclusion that Alkhas had sexually abused a 21-year-old patient. Following Dr. Manfred Alkhas’s incarceration, a sexual battery charge was elevated against him.
When the preliminary hearing for the sexual battery criminal charge took place in June 2014, Alkhas was “held to answer” for it. In the time since the California Chiropractic Board has granted him limited permission to provide chiropractic care while the criminal case is continued.
The efforts of the District Attorney’s Office, especially Deputy District Attorney Alaleh Kianerci, have been much appreciated by the Campbell Police Department. Though many factors made this case difficult to prosecute, police authorities said that Ms. Kianerci’s preparation and perseverance contributed to Dr. Alkhas’ conviction.
On a separate accusation of sexual intercourse with a person who was uninformed of the conduct because of deceptive representation, the jury was divided 10-2. Ten of the judges found him guilty. The case was declared a mistrial by the court, according to the Campbell police.
At the trial, a second victim—whose identity was revealed after Alkhas’ arrest—said that Dr. Manfred Alkhas had sexually raped her when she was five or six years old.
She said that in the 1980s when she and Dr. Manfred Alkhas were attending an Assyrian cultural center in San Jose, he inappropriately touched her under her clothing. Dr. Manfred Alkhas was not subject to charges since the crime was committed after the time limit had passed.
By the end of the investigation, the Campbell Police Department had warned the public to contact them if they had any concerns about Alkhas or knew of any further potential victims.
He was scheduled to be sentenced on October 30.
The Effects
Despite his conviction, some patients expressed their “love” for the chiropractor on Tuesday, November 22, 2016, and he has received several recent reviews on Yelp that have received five stars.
According to the findings of an investigation conducted by KTVU into the records of the state about chiropractor licensure, Dr. Manfred Alkhas is still in possession of a current license, which permits him to continue his business.
Daniel Horowitz, Alkhas’s attorney, had said that the conviction is being appealed. In addition, he has requested that he be permitted to continue practicing medicine under monitoring and without seeing patients in private rooms while the appeal is being considered.
When a man’s means of sustenance are taken away while the case is still in the appeal stage, Horowitz considers this to be the worst possible thing that might happen.
In July 2016, Dr. Manfred Alkhas was presented with a sentence of two years in prison; however, since he was eligible for credit for time previously served, he was released from jail sooner than was originally anticipated.
This afternoon, KTVU reached out to the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. A spokesperson, Veronica Harms, informed us that Alkhas has the right to due process. She also said that, because the investigation is ongoing, Alkhas is legally allowed to practice for at least another month. After that, the board will decide whether to terminate, restrict, or revoke his license.
A short time later, however, Harms was able to get further information on the Alkhas matter and disclosed that, in light of an update that occurred one month ago, the board is aiming to revoke his license.
Even though the link on their website did not seem to be functioning properly to offer information on the disciplinary action that was taken against Dr. Manfred Alkhas, she pointed out that a name search of Dr. Manfred Alkhas on their website would uncover an accusation that was made the previous month.
Harms proceeded by adding that the board is working to have Alkhas’ license to practice chiropractic care revoked and that the organization was unaware that he had been seeing patients again as of that day. Both of these statements were added to the previous statement.
Harms also said that they were not entirely aware of what had taken on at the time, but that they would be able to go forward with the inquiry and include that information from that point on.
Since the organization had mistaken Dr. Manfred Alkhas’s sentence for a lengthier one, the state board said that a temporary prohibition on Dr. Alkhas’s ability to practice chiropractic expired following the completion of his sentence.
A member of the district attorney’s sexual misconduct section questioned why state regulators did not take action sooner to prohibit the chiropractor from continuing to practice after he was found guilty in October of the previous year and got his sentence in July. The doctor was found guilty of continuing to practice chiropractic.
If the board decides to take further action, Dr. Manfred Alkhas is permitted to continue to lawfully practice medicine.
According to his attorney, who is attempting to get the sentence reversed, the subsequent court date was then determined to occur in December.
Dr. Manfred Alkhas: Overview of the Case
According to the case study, Dr. Manfred Alkhas faced accusations of two crimes: one was deceitful sexual battery, and the other was sexual penetration when the victim was unaware of the sexual activity that had taken place. The jury failed to decide on his second charge, leading to a mistrial. He was found guilty of sex battery by the jury. Dr. Manfred Alkhas was sent to prison for two years.
What did the victims say that Dr. Manfred Alkhas did?
(i) Danielle Doe, the first victim
Since January 2013, Danielle Doe, the victim, has been receiving chiropractic therapy from Alkhas. In July 2013, Alkhas behaved improperly during a session. He made her stretch and caress her nipples and breasts, among other regions of her body.
Before he touched her vagina and inner thigh, she was asked to remove her garments. Anne Marie Doe, a separate woman who testified for the prosecution, said that she was assaulted by Alkhas more than 20 years before when she was a child.
Danielle’s upper chest area was painfully exposed during the X-rays that Dr. Manfred Alkhas took as part of her therapy. At another session, he undressed her tank top to show off her stomach and gave her a massage on her nipples and breasts while acting like he was trying to relieve a spasm. He kept rubbing her vagina as she lay on her back.
Alkhas urged her to turn over as he touched her vagina and buttocks with lubricant gel-covered hands. This surprised Danielle and made her feel like she was assaulted.
(ii) Anne Marie Doe, The Second Victim
Anne Marie Doe’s testimony is that in the mid-1980s, when she was a little kid, Alkhas touched her inappropriately. These incidents occurred when Alkhas was transporting her home after a program he was teaching at a community center.
On one occasion, he caressed her vagina while she was wearing underwear, and on another, he felt her vagina through her clothes to show the cups without touching them. He told her that these were their private affairs and gave her instructions to keep them that way.
Alkhas’s actions toward the victims—including unwanted touching while feigning to provide medical care—made them feel uneasy, mistreated, and coerced into hiding.
Consequently, it may be claimed that Alkhas is charged with improper contact in the situations of both victims during what should have been medical attention. These actions unnerved the victims, who felt violated and forced into hiding.
What did Dr. Manfred Alkhas testify to in support of himself?
Manfred Alkhas attempts to provide an explanation for his actions in Danielle and Anne Marie’s cases in his evidence. He said that he accidentally touched Danielle’s breasts while checking around her rib cage during a soft tissue assessment for her back issues. He emphasized that his motivations were therapeutic rather than driven by sexual desire.
He denied ever acting inappropriately toward Anne Marie and claimed to have been teaching at a community center while his brother was there. He connected the accusations against him to a theological debate that had broken out in the Assyrian community, where he was charged with disseminating controversial views about Mary.
Alkhas attempted to contextualize the accusations made against him and provide a professional defense of his actions in his evidence. He argues that his actions were essential for medical reasons, refutes any sexual misconduct, and assigns the responsibility for the allegations to other factors including religious disagreements. The synopsis emphasizes the salient points of his case, while the explanation dissects the context and details of his testimony.
Is Dr. Manfred Alkhas’s personality genuine or not?
Dr. Manfred Alkhas’s chiropractic expertise and commitment have been the subject of criticism. He claims to be the creator and primary treating physician of Good Life Chiropractic in San Jose, California, despite his lack of training. In the San Francisco Bay Area, his practice lacks the credibility he thinks it has, notwithstanding his statements.
As a way to surround oneself with great literature, Dr. Manfred Alkhas likes to read books by Philip Yancey, Daniel Coleman, and Robert Frost in his leisure time.
He boasts that Raphael Santi is his favorite Renaissance artist, but his charcoal drawings pale in comparison.
He has secured speaking gigs at the South Valley YMCA and CityTeam Ministries, despite his few donations,
Despite his lackluster academic performance, he graduated with a Doctor of Chiropractic degree from Palmer Chiropractic-West University. His Master of Divinity from Western Theological Seminary seems strange given his lack of genuine devotion.
Participation in the School of Natural Therapeutics curriculum and earning an undergraduate degree from San Jose State University are questionable achievements given his typically mediocre performance.
Putting aside these inconclusive pieces of evidence, his sexual assault of his female patients is glaringly obvious. Concurrently, I can make a connection between his personality and the false public relations he’s utilizing to further his career and himself.
Do you think what I’m saying is true? Because his staff works well together, it’s OK if his clinic gets good reviews; nevertheless, it’s harsh and much worse if I criticize his behavior.
Conclusion
A worrying pattern of behavior has become obvious now that we are aware that Dr. Manfred Alkhas was determined convicted of sexually harassing and that a second victim who had been through traumatic experiences as a youngster has been recognized.
The fact that the jury decided to find him guilty by a vote of 10-2 is proof of the seriousness of the allegations and the persuasiveness of the evidence that was presented that was presented.
The example of Dr. Manfred Alkhas demonstrates, if anything, how essential it is to have comprehensive research, stringent regulations on professional licensing, and a secure environment in which victims of abuse may air their concerns.
Even when those in positions of power are accused of wrongdoing, it emphasizes the need to hold institutions accountable for ensuring the safety of the general population.
